| The Infrasound Monitoring System for The CTBT
Control |
| |
| Dr Elisabeth Blanc |
| |
| Under the
implementation of the CTBT (Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty), monitoring systems
must be set up to provide worldwide coverage for the detection of nuclear
explosions with a yield of at least 1 kt. Methods based on infrasound
measurements allow the detection and localisation of the explosions in the
atmosphere. The international infrasound monitoring system comprises 60
stations located on all continents and several islands, especially in the
southern hemisphere, in order to provide a global coverage (Figure
1). |
| |
| |
| Figure 1: The
60 stations Infrasound network |
| |
| Monitoring technology |
| The sensors used for
the detection of the infrasound at the surface of the ground are
microbarographs. The sensitive part is a barometric aneroid below submitted to
deformations under atmospheric pressure changes. The sensors design eliminates
temperature induced drifts. Microbarographs generally provide the relative
pressure. The possible measurement of the absolute pressure in parallel allows
a direct calibration of the sensor. |
| The microbarographs
used for the CTBT measure infrasound in the range 0.02 to 4 Hz. They are
characterised by a good sensitivity (18 dB below the minimum acoustic noise),
and by a large dynamic (80 dB) in order to detect both explosions at very close
distances and explosions at distances up to several thousands of kilometres.
The sensors are equipped with acoustic filtering systems (microporous hoses or
pipes) to reduce the noise produced by the surface winds. |
| The infrasound
stations are composed of at least 4 sensors located in a triangle with a basis
of 1 to 3 km with a central point. This allows to determine the explosion
azimuth by triangulation, to remove false signals, not coherent at the scale of
the array, and to increase the station reliability. |
| |
 |
Figure 2:
Infrasound station. The stations detect and give the azimuth of the nuclear
explosions. The location is given by the intersection of different azimuths
|
| |
| |
| Infrasound signals from atmospheric explosions |
| Pressure waves are an
important component of the source signal produced by a nuclear explosion,
consisting essentially of sound waves in the infrasonic frequency domain
(periods of about one second to several minutes or more for large explosion
yields). |
| Infrasound is not
audible, its frequency is higher than that of sound waves. It propagates at the
sound speed in the atmospheric sound channel formed by the atmospheric
temperature gradients under the effects of the high altitude winds (Figure 3).
|
| |
| |
| |
| Figure 3: Ray
tracing showing the different possible infrasound paths (right). Typical wind
and temperature profiles are shown in the centre and left part of the figure.
|
| The rays are
reflected at the level of the temperature increases. High altitude winds
produce an anisotropy in the propagation. |
| Because of the
propagation effects, signals recorded at few hundreds of kilometres from the
explosion may be formed of several wave trains corresponding to different paths
in the atmosphere. |
| Figures 4 shows two
examples of signals recorded during a nuclear test of a few kilotons, at
distances of 440 and 450 km from the explosion to the north-west and east,
respectively. The signal recorded in the east corresponds to a propagation in
the direction of the high altitude winds while the signal in the north-west
correspond to a propagation with contrary winds. |
| |
| |
| The explosion signal
recorded at the East is composed of three different signals of 40 seconds, each
separated by about 30 seconds. Their amplitudes range from about ±130 Pa
(1st arrival) to ±70 Pa (3rd arrival). The signals obtained at the north
west are weaker and longer and only two arrivals are recorded. The duration of
the first signal is about 350 seconds, the amplitude is ±6 Pa, while the
second signal lasts about 100 seconds with an amplitude of ±1
Pa. |
| The decrease of
infrasound amplitude as a function of distance has been established empirically
from the French nuclear explosion database. The first dominant effect is
related to the high altitude winds. In some cases, they allow explosions of
about 10 kt to be detected at distances of up to 7000 km windward from the
explosion location, but they can make detection difficult at distances of about
1000 km in the opposite direction. The most significant impact comes from high
altitude stratospheric winds, with velocities ranging from 60-90 m/s at
altitudes of about 30-70 km (figure 3). These winds are essentially zonal
winds, directed to the West in the summer in the northern hemisphere, and to
the East in the southern hemisphere, the opposite occurring in winter.
Atmospheric models based on world-wide measurements provide wind profiles as a
function of time of year and latitude. |
Figure 5 shows the
amplitude (peak-to-peak), DP, of the pressure waves measured for tests of less
than 400 kt for distances D ranging from 150 to 7000 km. The plotted amplitude
is that of a 1-kt test, assuming a W1/2 variation, where W is the explosion
yield. The high altitude wind effect, determined by using the CIRA atmospheric
model, has been taken into account. The propagation law giving the amplitude DP
(in Pa) as a function of distance D (in km) and projection of stratospheric
winds Vp (in m/s) on the propagation direction is of the form
. |
| |
| |
| Infrasound noise |
| The infrasound noise
is produced by pressure turbulence induced by the winds at the ground surface.
An empirical law (Figure 6) has been determined by using meteorological data
performed at the infrasound stations for an open sensor and for different
system of acoustic filtering (circular or linear hoses). The noise varies by a
factor of 100 between quiet and disturbed conditions of wind. The noise can be
reduced by a factor of ten or more by well adapted filtering systems.
|
| |
 |
Figure 6:
Empirical law of infrasound noise versus wind speed at the ground
surface |
| |
| |
| Detection and location capability of the
network |
| The network detection
and location capabilities have been determined by modelling. The amplitude of
the infrasound from nuclear explosions is given by the empirical propagation
laws obtained from nuclear explosion data (Figure 5), the high altitude winds
being determined by the CIRA atmospheric model. The infrasound noise is
determined by the empirical law (figure 6) and a recent atmospheric model of
the wind at the ground surface. The map which gives the network detection
capability as a function of yield W is represented in figure 7. |
| The location
precision depends on the dimensions of the network: the most extended the
network, the better the precision. This precision depends also on the signal
characteristics. For an impulse signal, the precision of the time measurement
is the time increment (0.05 s for a sampling rate of 20 Hz). The azimuth error
is then 0.7° and 2° for a triangle base of 3 and 1 km, respectively.
The same computation, performed assuming the detection of a non-impulse signal
with a time measurement precision of a tenth of the period (0.6 s), gives an
azimuth error of 8° for a 3 km network base, and of 24° for a 1 km base
[16]. |
| |
| |
| Figure 7:
Detection capability by two stations of the infrasound network in January at 00
UT (left) and 12 UT (right). |
| |
| The detection
capability varies significantly as a function of the time of the day because of
the variation of the infrasound noise under the effect of the winds at the
surface of the ground. The map shows that, in the Pacific ocean, the detection
could be more difficult in conditions of high winds at the ground, specially
during daytime. This appears in the Pacific ocean because the density of the
station is lower than in the other parts of the word. In these areas the number
of station sensors will be increased in order to improve the detection
capability. The network will then detect 1-kt everywhere in the word. In
addition, the new development of more efficient acoustic filtering systems such
the STAR system improve the noise reduction and then the detection efficiency.
|
| The location
precision depends on the dimensions of the network: the most extended the
network, the better the precision. The location capability of the network has
been computed assuming an angle precision of 0.7° for a 3 km station array.
The location precision is estimated within a circle of about 100 km or less
everywhere in the word. |
| |
| Infrasound events |
| An experimental
prototype station developed by the CEA has been set up at Flers (Normandy) in
France. This station is a four-sensors array whose characteristics correspond
to the requirements of the CTBT monitoring network. |
| The PMCC (Progressive
Multiple Cross Correlation) method permits the analysis of the data in a
permanent way. Infrasound bulletins are edited every day, showing typical
infrasound events detected at the station. For each event, the infrasound
velocity and the azimuth are automatically determined. |
| Wave systems,
sometimes highly complex in nature, are propagated through the atmosphere.
Infrasound is produced by specific phenomena such as meteorological storms,
earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, winds over the mountains, the ocean swell
(microbaroms) or boreal aurora. |
| Well identified
signals produced by chemical explosions, supersonic aircrafts, thunderstorms or
microbaroms are used to test the data processing method and the detection and
location efficiency of the station. |
| Figure 8 shows
examples of signals obtained by the CEA several thousands of km from the
volcanic eruption of Mt. St. Helens and Pinatubo. They are compared to a
one-megaton explosion. Volcanic eruptions are powerful sources capable of
producing low-frequency waves that a one-megaton nuclear burst could not
generate. |
| |
| |
| Table 1 summarises
the main types of infrasound events detected at the station Flers. The
characteristics of these events have been determined and discrimination methods
can be defined for the event identification. |
| |
| Type |
characteristics |
complementary data |
quarry explosions specific
explosions |
generally <1kt the signal
frequency range depends on the source energy |
explosion characteristics |
| supersonic airplanes |
several daily flights several
signal phases generally observed |
trajectory details |
| volcano |
few large explosive eruptions (St
Helens, Pinatubo) local events possible |
seismic data |
| microbaroms from ocean
swell |
extended source regions very
frequently observed |
meteorological data,
satellites |
| thunderstorms |
lightning, convective
motions |
meteorological data |
| infrasound from auroras |
source available in high latitude
regions |
camera pictures |
| meteorites |
high altitude sources |
satellite data |
|
| |
| Table 1:
Different infrasound signals of man-made or natural origin |
| |
| Conclusion |
| Infrasound
measurements are well adapted for detecting and locating atmospheric
explosions. The explosion shock waves are characteristic, their low-frequency
components are able to propagate at long ranges and can be detected by
microbarographs. Previous measurements during nuclear and chemical explosions
have provided a database for estimating the detection and location capability
of the CTBT infrasound network. Experimental stations, such as the prototype
station Flers in France, are very useful in the study of noise and natural
disturbances. PMCC method is used to establish the daily infrasound bulletin
and several well identified infrasound sources such as quarry blasts, ocean
swell, supersonic aircraft or thunderstorms are permanently used to control the
detection and location efficiency. |
| |